World | WPN World People News

On July 14, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States will provide NATO with "the most advanced weapons" during a meeting at the White House with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Trump stated that if Russia fails to reach a peace agreement within the next 50 days, the U.S. will impose "extremely severe" tariffs on Russia. He emphasized that the weapons will be allocated by NATO to the areas where they are most needed.

Expressing strong dissatisfaction with Russia's actions in the Ukraine war, Trump warned that if no peace agreement is reached between Russia and Ukraine within 50 days, the U.S. will impose "extremely severe" tariffs. "We will impose secondary tariffs. If there's no deal in 50 days, the tariff rate will go up to 100%. It's that simple," Trump told reporters at the White House, signaling a tough U.S. stance on the Ukraine issue.

South Korea's medical reform controversy has taken a major turn. The Korean Medical Association told AFP on July 14 that thousands of medical students have decided to end their 17-month-long boycott, with an estimated 8,300 students expected to return to campus. The move is expected to ease mounting pressure on the healthcare system caused by both the doctors’ strike and the student walkout.

The protest began in early 2024 when then-President Yoon Suk-yeol pushed through a plan to significantly increase medical school admissions, citing the need to address doctor shortages in South Korea’s rapidly aging society. The policy sparked fierce backlash from the medical community. In response, resident doctors went on strike and medical students boycotted classes, leading to surgery cancellations and disrupted medical services across the country. The government eventually announced a freeze on the enrollment expansion in March this year, paving the way for negotiations.

The Korean Medical Student Association said that a prolonged boycott could lead to the collapse of the medical system and thus decided to resume classes. Each medical school will determine its own schedule for reopening. Prime Minister Kim Min-seok welcomed the decision, calling it a “major breakthrough,” and revealed that President Lee Jae-myung is actively considering follow-up solutions. However, around 12,000 resident doctors—on strike since last year—have yet to return to work, and the broader crisis in the medical sector remains unresolved.

Israeli airstrikes on Gaza continue to escalate, with another aid distribution center hit in the latest attacks. On Saturday, July 13, at least 27 more people—mostly women and children—were killed. Gaza residents say so-called "safe zones" are a myth, calling them "death traps."

Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, stated that since early June, 798 Palestinians have been killed near aid distribution sites, showing that even humanitarian zones are not spared from the conflict. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) denied the accusations, asserting they did not target civilians near these areas.

The IDF recently released aerial footage showing plumes of smoke rising across Gaza, claiming they had carried out precision strikes on 35 Hamas targets. In reality, civilians depend on the few remaining operational aid centers for basic necessities—locations that are repeatedly bombed, raising fears of a worsening humanitarian disaster. “We were lied to. There is no safe place. Children are being killed and bleeding right before our eyes,” a Gaza resident tearfully said.

Meanwhile, ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, mediated by Qatar, have once again stalled. Hamas accused Israel of introducing new demands, including the right to maintain a military presence in Gaza after the war. Egyptian diplomatic sources confirmed that Jerusalem has continued to add new conditions, casting further doubt on the peace process.

In Israel, public pressure for a ceasefire and hostage deal is growing. Thousands have taken to the streets in recent weeks. One protester stated, “It’s time to end this war. Free the hostages and stop the fighting—there’s no time to waste.”

International voices have also joined the outcry. The UK saw large pro-Palestinian demonstrations for the second weekend in a row. Last Saturday, London police responded forcefully, arresting 41 protesters. Marchers chanted slogans like “Genocide is against international law.” The activist group “Palestine Action,” which participated in the protests, was recently designated as a banned organization by the UK government, and its appeal was rejected by the courts.

On July 9, 2025, former U.S. President Donald Trump sent a letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, announcing that starting August 1, the U.S. would impose up to 50% “reciprocal tariffs” on Brazilian goods. This represents the highest tariff rate among the 22 countries currently facing U.S. trade pressure.

Trump claimed the move was in response to Brazil’s legal actions against former President Jair Bolsonaro, denouncing them as a political “witch hunt.” He described Bolsonaro as a U.S. ally who deserves support. Trump added that he is open to negotiations, but “not at this time.”

President Lula strongly criticized the measure, calling it a serious interference in Brazil’s judicial sovereignty. He announced that Brazil would invoke its Economic Reciprocity Law to impose retaliatory tariffs of the same 50% rate on U.S. products. Lula emphasized that “respect must be mutual,” warning that if Trump escalates the tariffs, Brazil will take further countermeasures accordingly. His administration also stated it may suspend parts of trade agreements, limit intellectual property protections, or pursue action through the WTO to defend national interests.

Numerous international media outlets pointed out that the U.S. decision is primarily politically motivated, particularly as the U.S. runs a trade surplus with Brazil — estimated at $4.2 to $7.4 billion in 2024. The Brazilian market reacted immediately, with prices rising on key exports like coffee beans and orange juice. Given Brazil’s dominant role in global coffee production, the move is expected to disrupt U.S. inventory levels.

Economists warn that if the tariffs take effect as planned, they could spark a bilateral trade war, slow economic growth, fuel inflation, and lead to legal complications in trade processes. Nevertheless, the U.S. market remains stable for now, as investors widely expect Trump may revise or walk back parts of the threat, and that not all measures will be implemented in full.

Following President Donald Trump's inauguration and his push for aggressive reforms, the U.S. State Department announced on the 11th that it would undergo a major personnel restructuring. Over 1,300 employees were dismissed that day, including more than 1,100 civil servants and 240 foreign service officers. According to the State Department’s previously submitted reorganization plan, the total number of layoffs and voluntary departures is expected to reach 15% of the workforce, affecting more than 1,800 employees.

In addition to downsizing personnel, the State Department's organizational structure will also be overhauled. Departments with overlapping functions, high redundancy, or those deemed inconsistent with President Trump's foreign policy goals and lacking in effectiveness will be targeted for adjustment. Redundant units and staff will be eliminated. Out of the State Department’s 734 units, over 300 are expected to be streamlined, merged, or eliminated.

According to media reports, the list of dismissed employees indicated that, starting at 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Friday, they would no longer be allowed access to the office buildings or use their official email accounts. Outside the State Department headquarters lobby, many employees were seen wiping away tears and hugging friends and colleagues as they said their goodbyes after being forced to leave. Critics argue that this large-scale layoff will negatively impact the United States’ global standing.

This year, nearly 1,000 people have already suffered from heat-related illnesses—double the number from last year—with seven suspected deaths attributed to heatstroke. In early July, Seoul recorded a temperature of 37.7°C, marking the highest temperature ever recorded during the first ten days of July since meteorological observations began in October 1907.

According to South Korea’s automated weather observation systems, on July 8, temperatures reached 40.1°C in Sin-san-ri, Gwangtan-myeon, Paju City, Gyeonggi Province, and 40.2°C in Cheolsan-dong, Gwangmyeong City. This is the first time temperatures have surpassed 40°C since August 4 of last year. The highest temperature ever recorded in South Korea since modern meteorological records began in 1904 was 41°C in Hongcheon County, central Gangwon Province, on August 1, 2018.

On July 8, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) released updated data showing that 977 people have suffered heat-related illnesses since May 15 this year, compared to only 478 during the same period last year—doubling the previous year’s figure. In response to the extreme summer heat, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy reported that South Korea’s national electricity consumption peaked on July 7 at 93.4 gigawatts, a level typically seen during the height of summer.

This year, nearly 1,000 people have already suffered from heat-related illnesses—double the number from last year—with seven suspected deaths attributed to heatstroke. In early July, Seoul recorded a temperature of 37.7°C, marking the highest temperature ever recorded during the first ten days of July since meteorological observations began in October 1907.

According to South Korea’s automated weather observation systems, on July 8, temperatures reached 40.1°C in Sin-san-ri, Gwangtan-myeon, Paju City, Gyeonggi Province, and 40.2°C in Cheolsan-dong, Gwangmyeong City. This is the first time temperatures have surpassed 40°C since August 4 of last year. The highest temperature ever recorded in South Korea since modern meteorological records began in 1904 was 41°C in Hongcheon County, central Gangwon Province, on August 1, 2018.

On July 8, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) released updated data showing that 977 people have suffered heat-related illnesses since May 15 this year, compared to only 478 during the same period last year—doubling the previous year’s figure. In response to the extreme summer heat, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy reported that South Korea’s national electricity consumption peaked on July 7 at 93.4 gigawatts, a level typically seen during the height of summer.

Unprecedented torrential rains have battered the state of Texas over the past several days, resulting in catastrophic flooding that has left at least 100 people dead and dozens more missing. Thousands have been forced to flee their homes, as emergency officials warn that the danger is far from over despite a temporary lull in the rainfall.

The storms, which began mid-last week, have dumped more than 500 millimeters of rain in some areas, breaking records that have stood for decades. Major cities like Houston and Dallas have seen widespread power outages, road collapses, and neighborhoods submerged under water. Emergency crews are conducting ongoing search and rescue operations, though efforts have been hampered by high water levels and inaccessible infrastructure.

“We’ve never seen rainfall or damage on this scale. This is one of the worst natural disasters Texas has faced in recent years,” Governor Greg Abbott said at a press conference. He has declared a statewide emergency and urged residents to avoid flooded areas and refrain from attempting to drive through standing water.

Meteorologists warn that more storms are expected over the next 48 hours, potentially worsening conditions in already-devastated regions. Meanwhile, concerns are growing over contaminated drinking water, widespread power outages, and emerging public health risks.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has deployed teams and resources to assist local authorities, and temporary shelters are being established across affected counties. The International Red Cross has also launched an emergency appeal to support displaced families.

As Texas residents grapple with the aftermath of the flooding, experts are calling on lawmakers to invest in resilient infrastructure and long-term climate adaptation strategies to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

On July 7, U.S. President Donald Trump publicly called out the BRICS+ nations for “hostility toward the United States” and warned that any country supporting what he described as "anti-U.S. policies" would face an additional 10% punitive tariff. He emphasized that any actions undermining American interests would be met with “zero tolerance,” sparking widespread global political and economic concern.

The controversy stems from a 31-page joint declaration released at the BRICS Summit on July 6, which criticized unilateral economic sanctions and tariff measures. While the statement did not explicitly name the United States, it expressed strong discontent with Trump’s trade policies. The declaration argued that such actions violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and risk exacerbating global economic instability and widening inequality, drawing international attention.

Beyond economic issues, BRICS leaders also addressed the recent attacks on Iran and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Although the U.S. was not directly mentioned, many observers interpreted these statements as diplomatic pressure on Washington. Trump swiftly responded by labeling the BRICS bloc a “potential threat to American interests” and threatened steep tariffs on any country aligning with the group. Analysts warn that this could trigger a new wave of trade confrontation between the U.S. and emerging economies.

As geopolitical tensions continue to rise, the conflict between the Trump administration and the BRICS alliance now extends beyond trade, potentially influencing global market dynamics. With the international landscape growing increasingly complex, the world is closely watching the next move from the U.S.

On July 5, American billionaire Elon Musk announced the formation of a new political party independent of both the Republican and Democratic parties—the America Party. He claimed the new party would represent the “80% of centrist voters” in the U.S. and aims to gain seats in both the House and Senate in next year’s midterm elections. Musk also officially severed ties with former President Donald Trump, stating on social media that the U.S. is currently in a state of “de facto one-party rule,” with the two-party system being nothing more than an “illusion.” He called on the public to rethink their political choices.

Through a statement on his platform X (formerly Twitter), Musk outlined the vision of the America Party, describing it as a new political organization driven by technology, free speech, government transparency, and rational reform. He emphasized that the new party is committed to breaking the U.S. political deadlock and attracting voters disillusioned with the current system.

In a rare move, Musk directly criticized Trump and the Republican Party. He admitted to previously supporting Trump but expressed deep disappointment over the former president’s recent rhetoric and political tactics. Musk stated that Trump no longer stands for reform and freedom, but rather for consolidating entrenched power. He also condemned the Democratic Party, saying their behavior is “equally troubling,” arguing that the two major parties “differ little in core policies” and instead manipulate voters through divisive narratives.

“We are effectively living under a one-party dictatorship,” Musk declared. “People are forced to choose between two nearly identical options in a never-ending cycle.”

Analysts believe Musk’s move could reshape the landscape for the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election. While it remains unclear whether Musk intends to run for office himself, his vast social media influence and financial power could trigger a major political disruption.

However, critics say Musk’s remarks are inflammatory, and whether the new party will materialize in a concrete way remains uncertain. Political scholars in the U.S. note that third parties have historically faced systemic barriers, and their success depends heavily on organizational strength and the appeal of their policies.

In recent years, Musk has become increasingly active in political discourse, shifting from a liberal-leaning stance to strong critiques of political correctness and big government. In multiple interviews, he has described himself as “neither left nor right, but a modernist.” The formation of the America Party marks a new chapter in his evolution—from tech magnate to political influencer.