World | WPN World People News

The German government is preparing to reform its long-standing eight-hour workday system, a move that has sparked intense domestic debate.

The Federal Minister of Labor announced that a new working time reform bill is currently being drafted, with the draft proposal expected to be unveiled in June. The primary change involves lifting the current daily eight-hour limit and transitioning toward the European Union's Working Time Directive, which enforces a weekly maximum cap of 48 hours. The Labor Minister stated that the proposal represents a consensus reached among the parties within the governing coalition, aiming to introduce greater flexibility into the German Working Time Act (Arbeitszeitgesetz). Proponents argue it will enhance labor market flexibility and national competitiveness, while opponents contend that the move threatens the core spirit of worker protection that Germany has upheld for decades.

Under current German law, the daily working time is capped at 8 hours, though it can be extended to 10 hours under certain conditions. The core focus of this reform includes removing the strict daily 8-hour ceiling and replacing it with a maximum of 48 hours per week, in alignment with EU standards. Employees could potentially work up to 12 hours in a single day, provided that their total weekly hours do not exceed the statutory limit. Furthermore, to prevent worker exploitation and unpaid overtime, the bill will mandate electronic time tracking for all employees.

The ruling coalition states that the reform is a response to evolving labor markets and modern work styles. They believe flexible hours will benefit employees engaged in remote work or cross-timezone operations, while also helping workers better balance family and professional lives. Additionally, other protective measures remain unchanged, such as the requirement for at least 11 consecutive hours of rest between shifts and at least one full day off per week.

However, even before the draft proposal has been officially introduced, trade unions have rejected the initiative, arguing that existing laws already provide sufficient flexibility and that loosening daily limits would undermine worker protection. Debates also persist within the governing coalition itself, leaving it uncertain whether the adjustments will ultimately proceed as currently planned.

The German Trade Union Confederation (DGB) has expressed fierce opposition and launched a nationwide mobilization campaign. Union representatives warned that abolishing the daily limit would allow employers to legally demand shifts of 12 hours or longer, as long as other regulations are met. Employees in sectors with weaker union representation or lacking collective bargaining agreements—such as retail, hospitality, and logistics—would be particularly vulnerable to corporate exploitation with little recourse. Conversely, supporters of the reform counter that the 8-hour workday is a relic of the industrial era, making it ill-suited for a modern service-driven economy and the needs of dual-income families.

According to a survey conducted in May 2026, 57% of Germans support shifting from a daily limit to a weekly limit, a figure that rises to two-thirds among respondents of working age. Nevertheless, union-led polls consistently show that a majority of workers prefer to keep daily hours within the 8-hour mark. Media analysis suggests that while citizens desire more flexibility in allocating their work hours, they do not necessarily want to lose the protection offered by a daily cap.

Rainer Dulger, president of the Confederation of German Employer Associations (BDA), has also urged the public to accept a weekly working hour system. He emphasized that against the backdrop of labor shortages, an aging population, and sluggish economic growth, Germany requires a more flexible labor framework to boost national competitiveness. With unions having announced plans to escalate their protest actions starting June 1st, the final outcome may depend on whether the government can convince workers and fellow coalition members that flexibility and protection can coexist within the same piece of legislation.

The conflict between Israel and Lebanon has not subsided despite the 45-day extension of the ceasefire agreement in mid-May. Hezbollah, which was not a party to the negotiations, does not consider itself bound by the agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Hezbollah of repeatedly violating the ceasefire by using drones to attack Israeli military positions and northern towns. Earlier this week, he ordered the military to “intensify its strikes,” leading to a full escalation of the Israel–Lebanon conflict. The ceasefire agreement has effectively collapsed.

On the 27th, the Israeli military announced that all areas south of Lebanon’s Zahrani River would be designated a “combat zone,” covering approximately 14% of Lebanese territory. Residents of around 300 towns and villages were ordered to evacuate immediately and move northward. The Israeli military warned that it would strike Hezbollah forces in the area with “overwhelming force” and urged civilians to stay away from Hezbollah facilities and weapons storage sites.

At the same time the evacuation order was issued, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) launched intensive bombardments across southern Lebanon and the eastern Bekaa Valley. On the 26th alone, Israel reportedly carried out more than 120 airstrikes. Lebanon’s fourth-largest city, Sidon, the economic hub of Nabatieh, and the coastal city of Tyre all suffered devastating attacks.

Since March 2, the Israel–Lebanon conflict has resulted in more than 3,200 deaths and nearly 10,000 injuries, while over 1.2 million people have been displaced. Israel appears intent on establishing a long-term de facto “buffer zone” south of the Zahrani River and may even indefinitely occupy parts of the territory. Although Lebanese and Israeli military representatives are still expected to hold security talks at the Pentagon in Washington on the 29th, Hezbollah has explicitly rejected disarmament and stated that its retaliatory operations will continue unless Israel ends what it describes as aggression. Diplomatic efforts are facing a severe test of reality.

As the global climate crisis intensifies, many regions are experiencing “hell-level” heat waves. According to data from the UK Met Office, temperatures on Tuesday (May 26) exceeded 35°C, setting a new record for the hottest spring day ever recorded in the UK — more than 2 degrees higher than last year’s record. The UK also experienced its first-ever “tropical night,” a phenomenon in which nighttime temperatures remain above 20°C.

Temperatures at Heathrow Airport and Kew Gardens both surpassed 35°C. The immediate cause of the heat wave is a phenomenon known as a “heat dome,” in which a high-pressure system becomes trapped over Europe, locking warm air beneath it. Friederike Otto, a climate science professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science, described the situation as “absolutely astonishing.”

Scientists believe that climate change caused by human activity — primarily the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas — is accelerating global warming. However, even scientists have been shocked by the extent of this May’s temperature surge. What comes next may be a super El Niño event, which could push global temperatures even higher than usual, with 2026 and 2027 potentially breaking heat records once again.

On the 25th, Pope Leo XIV released his first historic encyclical since taking office, the 10,000-word Magnifica Humanitas, focusing on artificial intelligence (AI). He strongly warned that without moral and legal constraints, AI technology could bring about a “new form of digital slavery” for humanity. He urged governments around the world to take decisive action by introducing legislation to “disarm” AI and ensure that technological development returns to serving human dignity.

In the encyclical, the Pope sounded an alarm over civilization and morality. He emphasized that AI development should be guided by the “common good,” and that technology must never be used for military wrongdoing. He also stated that the pursuit of economic profit should not become a justification for replacing human labor with AI, stressing that AI should promote human well-being instead. In response to the rapid advancement of AI, Pope Leo XIV called on the international community to confront the impact and potential destruction that technology may bring to human civilization, insisting that humanity has a responsibility to guide AI toward a future grounded in human compassion.

The initiative immediately drew widespread international attention. Dario Amodei, co-founder of Anthropic, was invited to attend the release event. He admitted that the tech industry is under immense pressure to develop and monetize AI technologies, and said there is an urgent need for “a moral voice that is not swayed by self-interest,” as well as ethical scrutiny and guidance. U.S. Vice President JD Vance also praised the Pope’s AI encyclical, calling it an essential moral example for the modern age.

In addition to focusing on the technological crisis, the Pope recently issued a public apology in another setting for the historical institution of slavery. This encyclical serves not only as a stern warning against the misuse of technology, but also as a key declaration by the Pope to safeguard human agency and moral boundaries.

Japan is continuing to deepen its security cooperation with the Philippines. According to Japanese media reports, the Japanese government has largely decided to designate the Philippine military as a recipient of support for the fourth consecutive year under its Official Security Assistance (OSA) framework. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is expected to formally convey the decision during talks with Philippine President Bongbong Marcos on the 28th, while also promoting a further upgrade in bilateral security ties.

The two sides are also expected to agree on launching negotiations for a General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA), which would establish a framework for exchanging classified intelligence, prevent information leaks, and strengthen defense cooperation. If concluded, the agreement would enable Japan, the United States, and the Philippines to build a closer trilateral intelligence-sharing mechanism. Japan has previously provided coastal surveillance radars to the Philippines, and future cooperation may include sharing monitoring data to enhance regional security and deterrence capabilities.

Amid rising tensions in the South China Sea and growing regional security challenges, Japan is also considering providing defense equipment such as destroyers and trainer aircraft, while assisting the Philippines in developing military and energy infrastructure. Bilateral ties are expected to be elevated from a “strategic partnership” to a “comprehensive strategic partnership,” covering security, energy, and economic cooperation. At the same time, both sides are expected to further advance the vision of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” and deepen discussions on energy supply and trade cooperation.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry said on May 25 that Tehran and Washington have recently reached partial consensus on several contentious issues during negotiations, but the two sides remain some distance away from a formal agreement, making a final deal unlikely in the near term. The remarks suggest that although tensions between Iran and the United States have shown signs of easing after months of military confrontation and diplomatic standoffs, major differences still remain unresolved.

According to Reuters, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said both sides had reached “conclusions” on several topics included in a potential memorandum of understanding, but stressed that “no one should expect an agreement to be signed immediately.” He also criticized inconsistent public statements by U.S. officials, saying they had complicated the negotiations.

Current talks are mainly focused on security in the Persian Gulf, freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. naval blockade measures, and possible future ceasefire arrangements. Washington is reportedly seeking to use a multi-point memorandum as a framework for broader negotiations, including longer-term discussions on Iran’s nuclear program and missile activities.

U.S. President Donald Trump recently said that negotiations with Iran had made “substantial progress,” but emphasized that if a deal failed to meet U.S. demands, it would be better not to have one at all. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also stated that diplomacy remains Washington’s preferred option, while warning that other options remain available.

Several media outlets reported that proposals currently under discussion may include Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz, the United States gradually easing certain sanctions, and measures to limit or transfer Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. However, Iranian hardliners, hawkish members of the U.S. Congress, and Israeli officials have all expressed deep concerns over the possible terms of any agreement, leaving the outlook uncertain.

Analysts say that although neither side currently wants the conflict to escalate again, the complexity of issues involving Iran’s nuclear ambitions, regional influence, sanctions relief, and security guarantees means that even with some progress achieved, reaching a comprehensive agreement in the short term remains highly difficult.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) is facing a major Ebola outbreak, with local officials reporting that the death toll has reached 204. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said three volunteers are suspected to have died from Ebola, while neighboring Uganda confirmed three new Ebola cases.

According to AFP, health authorities in DR Congo said three provinces have reported 204 deaths and 867 suspected cases. However, the latest figures released by the World Health Organization on the 22nd showed 177 deaths and 750 suspected cases.

The WHO has declared the highly contagious Ebola outbreak a Public Health Emergency. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention warned that Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Zambia are all at risk of being affected by the virus.

Ebola is a highly fatal zoonotic disease with an incubation period of around 2 to 21 days. In severe cases, patients may suffer systemic bleeding leading to organ failure and death. The virus spreads mainly through bodily fluids such as blood and vomit. Since it was first identified in 1976, several major outbreaks have occurred in DR Congo.

The Ebola virus can survive for hours on dry surfaces and for days in bodily fluids. Traditional practices in affected communities, such as washing and touching bodies during funeral rites and gathering in large mourning ceremonies, have accelerated the spread of the disease. In addition, many infected communities believe the illness is caused by “witchcraft,” prompting people to seek treatment from traditional healers instead of hospitals, delaying case reporting and complicating containment efforts. Days earlier, angry residents set fire to a hospital after learning a body would not be returned for burial, partially destroying the facility and highlighting the conflict between traditional customs and public health measures.

Countries bordering DR Congo, particularly Uganda, Rwanda, and South Sudan, face an elevated risk of transmission. Rwanda has closed its border with DR Congo, while Uganda has urged citizens to avoid hugging and handshakes. Uganda’s president has also postponed local pilgrimage events to prevent mass gatherings.

The United States announced $13 million in emergency aid for DR Congo and Uganda and said it is considering additional funding through United Nations humanitarian programs while also implementing outbreak-related travel restrictions. The WHO declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Authorities in DR Congo said they are relying on hard-earned experience and public health measures to confront the country’s 17th Ebola outbreak.

On May 20, the U.S. Department of Justice deliberately chose Miami’s Freedom Tower to unseal an indictment that had been approved on April 23 by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida. The indictment charges former Cuban national leader Raúl Castro, now 94 years old, for his alleged involvement in the 1996 shootdown of two American civilian aircraft that resulted in the deaths of four people on board.

The decision to unseal the indictment on May 20 — a date commemorating Cuba’s independence from Spanish rule — at both the Miami headquarters of “Brothers to the Rescue” (BTTR), the organization to which the victims belonged, and at Freedom Tower, an important landmark for Cuban exiles, symbolized an escalation of U.S. pressure on the Cuban government.

The incident occurred on February 24, 1996, when the Cuban Air Force shot down two Cessna aircraft belonging to the Miami-based humanitarian organization “Brothers to the Rescue” (BTTR) in international airspace without warning.

At the time, the aircraft were conducting search and rescue missions for Cuban refugees at sea. Castro has been charged with one count of conspiracy to murder U.S. citizens, four counts of murder, and two counts of destruction of aircraft. If convicted, he could face the death penalty or life imprisonment. Also indicted alongside Castro were five Cuban military pilots.

The incident resulted in the deaths of four crew members: Carlos Costa, Armando Alejandre Jr., Mario de la Peña, and Pablo Morales.

The White House also issued a statement on Cuba’s Independence Day, criticizing the current Cuban Communist leadership as a “direct betrayal” of the country’s founding ideals and reaffirming continued pressure on the government in Havana. Measures cited included recent visits to Havana by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, while President Donald Trump had previously threatened to impose an oil blockade on Cuba and pursue regime change.

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized during a press conference that regardless of rank or how much time has passed, the United States will never forget its citizens, and any leader responsible for killing Americans must be held accountable.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel dismissed the U.S. move as a “political theater”, arguing that it lacked any legal basis and served only as a pretext for military aggression against Cuba. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla reiterated that Cuba’s actions at the time were based on self-defense and mocked the U.S. initiative as driven by “nostalgia for neo-colonialism”.

Although U.S. authorities have issued a warrant for Castro’s arrest, the absence of an extradition treaty between Cuba and the United States means the move is widely viewed as carrying more symbolic significance than practical effect.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that a planned new wave of military strikes against Iran, originally scheduled for the 19th, has been temporarily suspended at the request of the leaders of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, as “serious negotiations” are currently underway. In a post on social media, Trump stated that an agreement “acceptable to the United States” and emphasizing that “Iran cannot possess nuclear weapons” is close to being reached and would satisfy all parties. However, he also warned that if negotiations collapse, the U.S. military stands ready to launch a large-scale, full-scale attack at any time. Iran has not publicly responded.

According to foreign media reports, Iran currently maintains control over the Strait of Hormuz and is coordinating with Washington through Pakistan. Iranian media indicated that Tehran has proposed conditions including a comprehensive ceasefire, the lifting of the U.S. blockade, guarantees against future attacks, war reparations, and recognition of its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

Reports also suggest that the United States has requested that Iran retain only one nuclear facility and transfer its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to the United States. Trump had previously indicated that he might accept Iran suspending its nuclear program for 20 years instead of permanently terminating it.

Meanwhile, Trump is facing growing domestic political pressure. According to the latest poll conducted by *The New York Times* and Siena College, as many as 64% of respondents believe that going to war with Iran was the wrong decision, while Trump’s approval rating has fallen to 37%.

According to a report by NBC News citing two U.S. officials, ceasefire negotiations with Iran have collapsed, and President Donald Trump is preparing to resume large-scale military operations. At the same time, the military is reportedly considering renaming the war against Iran as “Operation Sledgehammer.” The administration may also seek to restart the 60-day military engagement period under U.S. law that requires congressional authorization for combat operations.

The United States and Israel jointly launched a major military campaign against Iran on February 28. Last month, Washington suspended the airstrike campaign known as “Operation Epic Fury” and instead shifted to a strategy focused on blockading Iranian ports to increase pressure. Iran responded by stating that it would not reopen the Strait of Hormuz unless Washington ended the blockade.

If the ongoing diplomatic negotiations fail to produce a permanent resolution, the United States is highly likely to resume and expand military operations against Iran. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth stated, “We have escalation plans if necessary.” He also acknowledged that the White House has another contingency plan involving the complete withdrawal of more than 50,000 American personnel from the Middle East.

Two Middle Eastern officials told The New York Times that Israel and the United States are conducting intensive preparations for renewed attacks on Iran. According to officials cited by the newspaper, options for restarting military and infrastructure operations against Iran include bombing strategic sites, seizing Kharg Island — Iran’s main oil export hub in the Persian Gulf — and deploying special operations forces into Iran to remove nuclear materials buried beneath previously bombed ruins.

Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of initiating military action and obtain authorization, or otherwise withdraw forces within 60 days. Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that “Operation Epic Fury” had concluded. Observers believe that if military action resumes, President Donald Trump may adopt a different operation name to avoid domestic legal challenges and congressional backlash.