Oil and Gas Leases Denied on Scenic Public Lands in Wyoming and Utah | WPN World People News

The 10th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals Tuesday rejected a challenge by the energy industry attempting to force the Secretary of the Interior to issue oil and gas leases on public lands in Utah and Wyoming. The Interior Department declined to issue the leases after it found that that its Bureau of Land Management had not fully complied with laws and policies designed to protect sensitive resources like sage grouse and wilderness values.

San Rafael Desert in Utah is known for its scenic sandstone formations, expansive panoramas and fragile archeological resources.

Specifically, the court ruled that the appeal was premature in view of pending decisions before the Interior Department’s own review board. The suit originally involved bids on 118 leases in Wyoming and Utah. Only eight oil and gas leases in Wyoming remain in contention. The Department issued some of the contested leases after further review, but determined others required additional environmental assessment or protective measures.

The decision let stand a June 2011 U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming ruling in favor of the Interior Department. That ruling upheld Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar’s decision to consider impacts to land, water quality, air quality and wildlife as part of the decision making process about the level of energy development on public lands.

“This is a victory for Wyoming and Utah’s beautiful public lands,” said Melanie Kay, Earthjustice attorney for the conservation groups who intervened in the case to defend the Secretary’s decision. “The district court recognized that the Interior Department, not the energy industry, holds the reins when it comes to deciding whether and how much to drill on public lands. Where the lands are scenic wonders with ecological value, the Secretary has the full authority to just say no.”

“The oil and gas industry sued to try to force the BLM to sign over oil and gas leases to some of our most sensitive natural lands like potential wilderness in Adobe Town, sage grouse Core Areas, and big game crucial winter ranges before formal citizen protests had been dealt with,” said Erik Molvar, Wildlife Biologist with Biodiversity Conservation Alliance. “But the court ruled against them, because they didn’t wait until a final agency decision was made before going to court. The new leasing reforms put in place under the Obama administration not only require the federal government to take a hard look at impacts to lands that might be leased, but also require all protests to be resolved before the auction, so these kinds of delays don’t happen anymore.”

Source: Earthjustice