World | WPN World People News

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced that when reviewing applicants' eligibility for U.S. residency, it will expand its scrutiny to include whether individuals express "anti-American" views on social media. The agency has been actively denying or revoking visas for those deemed to act against U.S. foreign policy interests. As part of a broader tightening of student visa policies, more than 6,000 international student visas have been revoked since the beginning of 2025.

According to a statement from USCIS, the privilege of living and working in the United States is not a right, but a benefit that should not be extended to those who promote anti-American ideologies. Therefore, social media screening has been added to the vetting process, with a broader scope to detect potential support for terrorism or threats to national security. While "support for terrorism" is not specifically defined, the criteria now include whether the applicant holds anti-American views or promotes **anti-Semitic ideologies**.

International students have also become key targets in the crackdown on immigration. Reports indicate that over 6,000 international student visas have been revoked so far in 2025, primarily due to overstaying, legal violations, or suspected support of terrorism. Among these, approximately 4,000 students lost their visas due to legal offenses such as assault, drunk driving, robbery, arson, domestic violence, human trafficking, and child endangerment. Around 300 students were flagged for participating in pro-Palestinian protests or raising funds for Hamas, actions considered indicative of anti-Semitic tendencies or support for terrorism.

The Trump administration has emphasized that visa revocations help prevent terrorism supporters from entering the U.S. under the guise of being students, thereby safeguarding national security. Under the administration’s strict visa policies, a total of about 40,000 visas have been revoked in 2025 alone, with student visas making up a large portion. In July, fewer than 79,000 student visa holders entered the U.S., marking a 28% decline.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced that when reviewing applicants' eligibility for U.S. residency, it will expand its scrutiny to include whether individuals express "anti-American" views on social media. The agency has been actively denying or revoking visas for those deemed to act against U.S. foreign policy interests. As part of a broader tightening of student visa policies, more than 6,000 international student visas have been revoked since the beginning of 2025.

According to a statement from USCIS, the privilege of living and working in the United States is not a right, but a benefit that should not be extended to those who promote anti-American ideologies. Therefore, social media screening has been added to the vetting process, with a broader scope to detect potential support for terrorism or threats to national security. While "support for terrorism" is not specifically defined, the criteria now include whether the applicant holds anti-American views or promotes **anti-Semitic ideologies**.

International students have also become key targets in the crackdown on immigration. Reports indicate that over 6,000 international student visas have been revoked so far in 2025, primarily due to overstaying, legal violations, or suspected support of terrorism. Among these, approximately 4,000 students lost their visas due to legal offenses such as assault, drunk driving, robbery, arson, domestic violence, human trafficking, and child endangerment. Around 300 students were flagged for participating in pro-Palestinian protests or raising funds for Hamas, actions considered indicative of anti-Semitic tendencies or support for terrorism.

The Trump administration has emphasized that visa revocations help prevent terrorism supporters from entering the U.S. under the guise of being students, thereby safeguarding national security. Under the administration’s strict visa policies, a total of about 40,000 visas have been revoked in 2025 alone, with student visas making up a large portion. In July, fewer than 79,000 student visa holders entered the U.S., marking a 28% decline.

Air Canada recently experienced a massive employee strike following a breakdown in negotiations between the union and company management. The strike severely disrupted flights at major airports across the country, throwing travel plans of tens of thousands of passengers into chaos. After several tense days, the Canadian federal government officially intervened late last night, facilitating a preliminary agreement between the two parties. This morning, Air Canada announced the full resumption of normal flight operations, temporarily resolving the crisis.

On August 19, Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which represents over 10,000 flight attendants, reached a preliminary agreement, ending the strike that began last Saturday. With the help of the federal government's chief mediator, both sides engaged in nine hours of negotiations and reached a deal in the early hours of the 19th, bringing an end to a labor dispute that had affected hundreds of thousands of passengers. Air Canada stated that while flights would begin to gradually resume that night, full recovery would take 7 to 10 days. Some passengers whose flights were canceled during the strike still face challenges rebooking.

The conflict stemmed from long-standing disputes between Air Canada's labor union and management over issues such as work hours, wage adjustments, and labor protections. After negotiations collapsed, the union launched a strike over the weekend involving ground staff, maintenance crews, and customer service personnel. The large-scale work stoppage caused massive delays and cancellations. At Toronto Pearson Airport alone, over 40% of flights were affected. Many travelers were stranded at airports, and some international passengers missed connecting flights, sparking widespread frustration.

Amid growing public pressure and mounting passenger dissatisfaction, both the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Labour called on the two sides to return to the negotiating table, stressing that "maintaining stable air transportation is critical to the national economy and public welfare." Coordinated by the Prime Minister’s Office, government mediators worked through the night to facilitate talks. After several closed-door sessions, a preliminary consensus was reached. The agreement includes gradual improvements to employee work schedules, moderate wage increases, and enhanced guarantees for vacation time and workplace safety. The union stated that while some details remain to be negotiated, they are willing to suspend the strike in consideration of passenger rights.

In a statement released this morning, Air Canada thanked the government for its active involvement and pledged to restore flight operations as quickly as possible. The airline also promised to assist affected passengers with rebooking and compensation. Additionally, the company issued a public apology and said it would review its internal labor communication mechanisms to prevent future disruptions. Union leaders emphasized that the strike was a last resort and expressed hope that the company would fulfill its commitments with sincerity.

While some affected passengers may still need several days to complete their rebooking, most flights are gradually returning to normal. The Canadian Ministry of Transport has advised travelers to stay updated with airline announcements and arrive at airports early to avoid delays due to potential congestion at security and check-in counters.

Analysts noted that the Air Canada strike highlights long-standing tensions in labor relations within the aviation industry and underscores the staffing pressures brought on by the rapid post-pandemic recovery. Although government intervention has temporarily calmed the situation, whether the agreements will be fully implemented remains to be seen and will test both parties' sincerity. Many observers believe that unless fundamental differences are resolved, Air Canada could face similar labor disputes in the future.

While this crisis has come to a close, bringing relief to travelers nationwide, various sectors of society are calling on the government and airlines to proactively develop long-term strategies to ensure transportation stability and safeguard the public's basic right to travel.

The White House announced that U.S. President Donald Trump will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at 1:15 p.m. Eastern Time on August 18 (1:15 a.m. Taiwan time on August 19). Later that day, at 3:00 p.m. (3:00 a.m. Taiwan time), Trump will host a meeting in the East Room with multiple European leaders. The talks are being regarded as a potential diplomatic turning point in the Russia-Ukraine war. Zelensky arrived in Washington late on the 17th and wrote on Telegram: “I thank the U.S. President for his invitation. We all hope for a swift and reliable end to this war. Russia must put an end to the war it started.” He stressed the hope of working together with the U.S. and European allies to compel Russia to end the conflict and achieve real peace.

Leaders of the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and Finland, along with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, will accompany Zelensky at the White House meeting to demonstrate steadfast support for Ukraine. European leaders have voiced concerns that Trump might reprise the tense clash he had with Zelensky at the White House in February, underscoring that any peace deal must include both Ukraine and the EU. EU foreign policy representative Kaja Kallas stated: “This war is not only against Ukraine, but a challenge to the freedom of all Europe.”

Following his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, Trump publicly said that the war could end if Ukraine agreed to relinquish Crimea and pledged never to join NATO. His remarks triggered strong backlash across Europe, while Zelensky firmly rejected the notion of “land for peace,” stressing that Ukraine’s legally recognized borders are non-negotiable. Although Trump has styled himself as a mediator pushing for a trilateral summit, Moscow has said conditions are not yet ripe, while Zelensky has insisted that any agreement must guarantee Ukraine’s security and sovereignty.

After the U.S.-Russia summit concluded, despite lengthy talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the two sides failed to reach a ceasefire agreement in the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump later wrote that the best way to end the war was not a ceasefire, but a “direct peace agreement,” stressing that his calls with President Zelensky and European leaders “went very well.” Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed support for Trump’s idea of a “U.S.-Ukraine-Russia trilateral meeting” and announced that he would travel to Washington on the 18th to meet with Trump to discuss concrete plans to end the war. Trump revealed that if progress goes smoothly, the next step would be arranging another meeting with Putin, emphasizing that “this could save millions of lives.”

Following the U.S.-Russia summit, leaders of major European nations quickly issued a joint statement, reaffirming their steadfast support for Ukraine and commitment to its security. The statement was signed by French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, European Council President António Costa, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The statement stressed that Ukraine must have “ironclad security guarantees,” that its military capabilities and international cooperation should not be restricted, and that Russia has no right to veto Ukraine’s accession to the EU or NATO. European leaders unanimously declared that international borders cannot be changed by force, pledging to continue strengthening sanctions on Russia and imposing broader economic measures until a just and lasting peace is achieved.

European leaders also voiced public support for Ukraine. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Trump’s diplomatic efforts on social media, saying they had brought the end of Russia’s illegal war “closer than ever,” while stressing that no negotiations could bypass Zelensky. He welcomed U.S. and European security guarantees and reiterated that Europe would continue to escalate sanctions until Putin ends his aggression. French President Emmanuel Macron stated that in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression, Europe must stand firm in supporting Ukraine and maintaining pressure on Moscow. He emphasized that peace must be built on “robust security guarantees,” and reminded the international community of Russia’s repeated failures to honor its commitments over the past 30 years, reaffirming that France would “stand firmly alongside Ukraine.”

In a recent summit held in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Russian president proposed conditions to end the Russia-Ukraine war. The core of the proposal requires Ukraine to relinquish control over its eastern territories in exchange for Russian forces freezing other frontlines.

According to reports from the Financial Times, The Guardian, and Reuters, Putin’s terms include Ukraine’s full withdrawal from Donetsk and Luhansk as a precondition for a ceasefire and peace talks. In return, Russia would agree to freeze its positions in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia and halt further advances.

Following the talks, Trump swiftly shifted away from his long-standing call for an “immediate ceasefire,” instead naming a “Peace Agreement” as the preferred solution. He argued that this would bring a definitive end to the conflict, unlike ceasefire deals that often “collapse and reignite.” Trump even disclosed that he had told President Zelensky that Putin would only negotiate peace if Ukraine surrendered the Donbas region, while the U.S. could potentially provide security guarantees in exchange.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky responded firmly, stressing that Kyiv would never concede and would defend its territorial integrity. He insisted that any negotiations must begin with a ceasefire, and that territorial issues could only be discussed with Ukraine’s full participation.

European allies voiced support for Zelensky’s stance, underscoring that Ukraine’s borders cannot be altered by force and calling for a ceasefire and negotiation framework that includes binding security guarantees and legal safeguards.

Beyond the territorial exchange, reports suggested that Putin presented broader demands: a written Western commitment to halt NATO’s eastward expansion, partial lifting of sanctions on Russia, recognition of Russian language and cultural rights, and protections for Russian-speaking communities within Ukraine. Other sources indicated that Putin’s ultimate objective is full control of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson before pursuing a comprehensive peace deal.

The U.S.-Russia summit ended without any substantive agreement. Putin walked away without making major concessions, while Trump’s policy shift drew sharp concern from Europe and Ukraine. Critics warned that Trump’s approach risked handing Russia a significant political victory while undermining Ukraine’s position. The Financial Times even described Ukraine as feeling “betrayed,” accusing Trump of supporting a plan that effectively sells out years of Ukrainian resistance.

Observers believe Zelensky will not accept the loss of Donetsk, though he remains open to discussing territorial matters with Trump. Zelensky is scheduled to meet Trump in Washington on the 18th. The White House has declined to comment on reports about the Trump-Putin talks.

With negotiations stalled, media outlets and think tanks suggest two possible scenarios ahead:

“Partition with Protection” — Ukraine is unable to reclaim all its lost territory, but a peace agreement freezes the current frontlines, with Western security guarantees protecting its remaining sovereignty.

“Partition with Subordination” — Weakened by military strain and domestic fatigue, Ukraine may be forced into becoming a client state under Russian influence, losing genuine independence.

On August 14, heavy rainfall suddenly struck the Kashmir region of India, triggering landslides and flash floods. The disaster has resulted in more than 56 deaths and at least 200 people reported missing, marking the second deadly flash flood to hit the Indian Himalayas since August.

The incident occurred in the town of Chasoti, located in the Kishtwar district, which serves as a key rest stop along a popular pilgrimage route. At the time, torrential rain destroyed the rest area in Chasoti where more than 200 pilgrims were gathered for a meal. The sudden floodwaters swept many of them away. Upon receiving reports, rescue teams along with military and police forces rushed to the scene to carry out search and rescue operations, combing through debris in search of survivors.

This year’s pilgrimage was originally scheduled to run from July 25 to September 5. However, due to this deadly flood, the local government has ordered all activities to be suspended. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed condolences to the victims and pledged full support for disaster relief efforts.

The meteorological department has forecast continued heavy rainfall in the coming days, warning of potential further landslides and flash floods.

Juneau, the capital of Alaska, has issued an emergency evacuation after flooding was triggered by the melting of the Mendenhall Glacier. The rapid melt caused water levels in Mendenhall Lake and Mendenhall River to surge, leading to a breach on the 13th. Meltwater flooded into streets and residential areas, prompting residents to evacuate. Climate change and glacier melt, driven by global warming, have made the Juneau area—located adjacent to Mendenhall Lake—face annual flood threats during the spring and summer seasons.

Dr. Eran Hood, an environmental science professor at the University of Alaska Southeast, stated that data shows floods from the Mendenhall Glacier have occurred annually since 2011, with the severity increasing over the past three years. The Mendenhall River, which normally has a depth of just 6 feet, reached 14.97 feet during the 2023 flood. In August last year, the river rose to 15.99 feet, submerging over 100 homes in the Mendenhall River Valley. Meteorologist Nicole Ferrin from the National Weather Service predicts that this year the river may rise to 16.6 feet.

Dr. Hood explained that the Suicide Glacier, located upstream of the Mendenhall Glacier, has now melted and left behind a basin. This basin collects rainwater, snowmelt, and glacial meltwater, effectively forming a dam. Water from the basin seeps underneath and overflows above the glacier, accelerating the melting of the Mendenhall Glacier and causing further downstream flooding.

As the U.S. Department of Commerce tightens its export restrictions on AI chips to China, lawmakers in both chambers of Congress have continued to push legislation aimed at tracking the location of AI chips to prevent them from being re-exported to China. Although the U.S. has eased restrictions on Nvidia’s H20 chips, Reuters reported that the U.S. government has quietly embedded tracking devices into certain high-risk AI chips to monitor their flow.

Citing two sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that the U.S. has long been installing tracking devices in shipments of advanced chips it suspects could be illegally diverted to China. The goal is to monitor specific shipments under investigation to determine whether they are re-exported to regions under U.S. export restrictions. This enables authorities to prosecute companies or individuals who profit from violating U.S. export controls. Such tracking devices have long been used by U.S. law enforcement agencies to track export-controlled items like aircraft parts, weapons, and narcotics.

Several insiders from the server product supply chain also revealed that they have seen U.S. authorities use trackers in shipments from companies such as Dell and Super Micro. These trackers were primarily used to trace Nvidia and AMD chips embedded in the products. However, there is no clear information on which agencies installed the devices or when. Some of the trackers are as large as a smartphone, while others are compact location beacons. Although installing trackers in shipment packages typically requires a court order, export enforcement personnel can sometimes proceed with only administrative approval.

Reuters noted that the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), which is responsible for export controls and enforcement under the U.S. Department of Commerce, typically participates in these investigations. The Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may also be involved. All three agencies declined to comment.

Among the vendors, Super Micro stated in a press release that the company strictly implements security policies designed to protect global operations, partners, and customers. Dell said it was unaware of the program, while Nvidia has not commented or responded.

U.S. President Donald Trump recently announced a large-scale crackdown on homelessness and crime in Washington, D.C., deploying the National Guard to the capital in a move he says is aimed at restoring “law and order.” The decision has sparked fierce backlash from local authorities and civil rights groups, who criticize it as an unprecedented expansion of federal power.

Trump posted on social media, stating that the homelessness crisis and deteriorating public safety in D.C. have severely damaged the nation’s image and security. He stressed the need to “immediately clear the streets of tents and drugs.” He added that the homeless would be relocated to shelters outside the city center, and those who refuse may face arrest.

A White House spokesperson later confirmed that Trump had invoked provisions of the *District of Columbia Home Rule Act* to place the D.C. police under the command of the U.S. Department of Justice. Approximately 800 National Guard troops have been deployed to assist with enforcement. On the first day of the operation, federal and local officers arrested more than 20 individuals on charges including firearms possession, drug offenses, violence, and drunk driving, and confiscated several illegal weapons.

Trump declared this was “the first step in taking back the capital,” saying cleanup efforts will continue over the coming weeks, with intensified crackdowns on drugs, gangs, and undocumented immigrants. He criticized past local administrations for “tolerating chaos,” which he claimed left the areas around Congress and major streets “dangerous and filthy.”

However, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser strongly objected to the move, pointing out that violent crime in the city has already dropped by over 20% this year and is now at its lowest level in 30 years, showing no security crisis that would justify federal intervention. She accused Trump of disregarding local autonomy and using the capital as a political stage.

Several legal experts and civil rights organizations also warned that the move may violate constitutional protections for local self-governance and infringe on the rights of the homeless. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) condemned the forced removals and arrests of unhoused individuals, saying it criminalizes poverty and does nothing to address root issues such as addiction and housing.

For now, tensions between federal and local governments continue to rise. The Trump administration insists the operation will proceed until the capital is “restored to order and dignity,” while opponents are threatening legal action to block the federal takeover and military deployment. The controversy, centered around public safety, poverty, and constitutional authority, is expected to ignite broader debate across American society.