Switching to Revenge Mode: Trump Signals Massive Strike on Iran | WPN World People News

U.S. President Donald J. Trump said in a media interview on the 23rd that his administration is carefully considering launching another round of strikes against Iran, one that would exceed the scale of the previous Operation Epic Fury. However, he emphasized that no timetable has been set and no final decision has yet been made.

Meanwhile, media reports claimed that Iran had rejected the latest U.S. ceasefire proposal, which was reportedly conveyed through Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi. According to anonymous officials familiar with the negotiations, Tehran believed the proposal failed to accommodate Iran's position regarding control of the Strait of Hormuz, leading to the collapse of the talks. In response, al-Zaidi's office issued a statement on the 24th, dismissing the reports as entirely inaccurate.

As of now, the United States has conducted 13 consecutive days of military strikes against Iran. In addition to expanding operations into Iran's southern provinces, the campaign is reportedly shifting further inland, targeting military command centers, drone storage facilities, communications networks, coastal surveillance stations, and naval warfare-related infrastructure.

Iran, in turn, has launched retaliatory attacks against Bahrain, Jordan, and Kuwait. So far, it has reportedly destroyed multiple facilities in Bahrain, including an Amazon data center, an air force fuel storage depot, a large equipment warehouse, and server room infrastructure. In Jordan, the Azraq Air Base and its maintenance hangars have also been targeted.

According to two individuals involved in mediation efforts, Iran's leadership has yet to accept the latest negotiation proposal and has therefore not responded positively. As military tensions continue to escalate, all parties are nevertheless continuing diplomatic efforts in pursuit of a negotiated settlement.

Note: This is a linguistic translation only. I have not verified the factual accuracy of the events described, and some claims (such as the operation name, timeline, and reported attacks) may require independent confirmation if they are intended for publication.