Commission president Barroso sells out on climate and energy policy | WPN World People News

Brussels –The European Commission has released a disappointing package of proposals on EU climate and energy policy up to 2030, said Greenpeace. EU governments now need to correct the flaws in these proposals and increase their ambition.

Commenting on the proposals, Greenpeace EU managing director Mahi Sideridou said: “The January sales are on and it looks like Europe’s dirty energy companies have bagged a bargain. The Commission’s plan for 2030 is a sell-out that would knock the wind out of a booming renewables industry. European citizens will pay the price: fewer green jobs, more imports of expensive fossil fuels and shorter lives because of pollution. Only a credible renewables target, alongside an ambitious carbon target, can shift the transformation of the EU’s energy system up a gear. EU governments now have to show some backbone and defend the climate by boosting clean energy.”

Renewables target - Slowdown

The Commission has proposed a binding EU target to increase the share of renewables to at least 27 per cent by 2030.

>>> Renewables have the potential to supply almost half of Europe’s energy in 2030. A target to only achieve 27 per cent would weaken Europe’s ability to transform its energy system. It would have a limited impact on Europe’s reliance on fossil fuel imports and leave Europeans and businesses exposed to volatile energy prices. The EU-wide binding target should also be made binding on member states.

Carbon target – 40 or 33 percent?

The Commission has proposed a binding EU target to cut carbon emissions by 40 per cent (without offsets) by 2030, compared with 1990 levels.

>>> This is insufficient for the EU to deliver its fair share of global emission reductions required to keep global warming within safe levels. A 40 per cent target would also fail to reinvigorate to the ailing carbon market. Research shows that unless the carbon market is fixed, it will weaken the 2030 target by seven percentage points, meaning the 40 per cent target could actually only be a 33 percent target.

Carbon market (ETS) – Still no permanent solution

The Commission’s legislative proposal calls for the creation of a stability reserve of carbon emission permits from 2021. Permits would be taken out of the carbon market progressively and throughout the trading period, depending on the volume of permits in the system.

>>> The stability reserve would only take part of the two billion surplus permits out of the system and would not do so fast enough to significantly impact the carbon price. On top of this, there is no guarantee that surplus permits would not re-enter the market in the future. Only permanent cancellation of surplus carbon emission allowances and strict 2030 targets can make the carbon market a driver for green investments.

Transport fuels target (FQD) – Giving up

The Commission has also proposed to abandon targets to curb carbon emissions from transport fuels under the fuel quality directive. The directive requires a six per cent cut in the carbon intensity of fuels by 2020. This target has not yet been implemented. The directive was expected to prevent imports of tar sands, one of the most polluting fuels on the planet.

>>> Abandoning obligations on the oil industry to reduce their carbon emissions would undermine Europe’s climate effort and open the door to tar sands.

European energy and environment ministers are likely to discuss the Commission’s proposal on 3 and 4 March. On 21 and 22 March, heads of state and governments will hold a dedicated EU summit aimed at reaching agreement. The Commission is then expected to release a binding legislative proposal in the second half of 2014.

Greenpeace is calling for a binding EU 2030 target to cut domestic emissions by at least 55 per cent, a binding target to increase the share of renewables to 45 per cent and a binding target for energy efficiency of 40 per cent.

Source: Greenpeace EU Unit